Re: [wg-review] 4. [GA] Comments

[Derek Conant - DNSGA <dconant@dnsga.org>]

In the context I used the word *sophisticated*, I would have rather you
interpreted it mean: wise, cultured or shrewd in human affairs.

Now, enough with the personal attacks.

Derek Conant


Joanna Lane wrote:

> Derek Conant wrote:-
>
> <My point is that if this WG is not sophisticated enough to understand that
> the
> GA must have certain representatives who are willing to be accountable for
> the
> record and direction of the GA, then a rudder will not help it.>
>
> The last thing this WG needs to be is *sophisticated* (adulterated: impure:
> not genuine) derived from *sophism* (a specious fallacy). However, I note
> that you consider yourself to be a  *sophist* (5th century BC Greece - a
> capatious or fallacious reasoner) and seek to *sophisticate* this WG, ( to
> corrupt by mixture.) That says it all.
>
> Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html