RE: [wg-review] 4. [GA] Comments

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Derek Conant wrote:-

<My point is that if this WG is not sophisticated enough to understand that
the
GA must have certain representatives who are willing to be accountable for
the
record and direction of the GA, then a rudder will not help it.>

The last thing this WG needs to be is *sophisticated* (adulterated: impure:
not genuine) derived from *sophism* (a specious fallacy). However, I note
that you consider yourself to be a  *sophist* (5th century BC Greece - a
capatious or fallacious reasoner) and seek to *sophisticate* this WG, ( to
corrupt by mixture.) That says it all.

Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html