RE: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:ERIC@HI-TEK.COM]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:51 AM

> The Judge got the property right but those poor registrars.  
> How can they charge
> for renewals if the judge orders it permanently transferred.

ees simple, the registries charge for publishing the name. Even if the
creative act is your own, you still need to publish the work-product. For
this, the registries charge and the registrars get commission, non?

Do not confuse creation and publication, they are not the same.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html