Re: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

I concur as theory but not from what I have seen Judges and WIPO do.  The
practice is totally different than the words by common useage.

Sincerely,

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> > From: Eric Dierker [mailto:ERIC@HI-TEK.COM]
> > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:51 AM
>
> > The Judge got the property right but those poor registrars.
> > How can they charge
> > for renewals if the judge orders it permanently transferred.
>
> ees simple, the registries charge for publishing the name. Even if the
> creative act is your own, you still need to publish the work-product. For
> this, the registries charge and the registrars get commission, non?
>
> Do not confuse creation and publication, they are not the same.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html