RE: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

From an operational perspective, I don't think any of the registries have a
mechanism that holds the name without publishing it. It is an additional
requirement they may not have allowed for.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:49 AM
> To: Miles B. Whitener
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9
> 
> 
> I think Eric means what happens if a registrant, having been 
> awarded the
> name permanently, then declines to make any payments. The 
> registrars cannot
> force the domain name holder to pay in perpetuity, but equally, cannot
> resell the name.
> Joanna
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Miles B. Whitener
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 1:23 PM
> To: Eric Dierker; Phil King
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9
> 
> 
> > The Judge got the property right but those poor registrars.
> How can they charge
> > for renewals if the judge orders it permanently transferred?
> 
> When you transfer a domain, the new domain holder pays renewal
> charges.
> Haven't you ever transferred a domain?
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html