Re: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:37:24PM -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
> Eric Dierker wrote:-
> The point is we do not need the UDRP.  The courts are better at it.
> 
> Now with that said, the courts may want the UDRP to lessen their work
> load.>
> 
> 
> And to handle small claims. Not everybody has 100K to gamble...:-)

And to deal with the fact that a court case across national boundaries 
with different languages may be a very very complex affair...

In any case, the question of whether we need a UDRP has already been 
settled -- we do.  The question is how to make it better.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html