RE: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Kent Crispin wrote:-

The changes I think need to be considered are:

1) competition among arbitration service providers must be arranged so
that they tend to produce uniform results.  "Forum shopping" should be
restricted to issues of price and service, not anticipated results.
[But if the trend noted by Mueller continues, and the numver

Please explain. I don't understand how competition among arbitration
services will
guarantee uniform results. (This is not a trick question).
Also, value judgements on service include anticipating results don't they?.
Or are you suggesting we specify service criteria?

2) there needs to be a feedback mechanism that corrects for really bad
decisions.

Excellent.

Sincerely,
Joanna

I say "considered" because neither of these are trivial issues.


--
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html