Re: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:37:23PM -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:
> At 1:13 pm -0800 2/8/01, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >In any case, the question of whether we need a UDRP has already been
> >settled -- we do.  The question is how to make it better.
> 
> As in "what changes need to be made" or "how the hell do we get the damn
> thing improved" ?

The changes I think need to be considered are:

1) competition among arbitration service providers must be arranged so
that they tend to produce uniform results.  "Forum shopping" should be
restricted to issues of price and service, not anticipated results.  
[But if the trend noted by Mueller continues, and the numver

2) there needs to be a feedback mechanism that corrects for really bad 
decisions.

I say "considered" because neither of these are trivial issues.


-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html