RE: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

A good appeals process would also help.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
|>Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
|>Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:30 PM
|>To: Kent Crispin; wg-review@dnso.org
|>Subject: Re: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10
|>
|>
|>At 16:23 8/02/01 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
|>
|>>> 2) there needs to be a feedback mechanism that corrects for really bad
|>>> decisions.
|>>> 
|>>> Excellent.
|>>
|>>But very tricky.  Remember that one of the goals of the UDRP is to 
|>>*not* have it be a substitute for the law, and if you build, for 
|>>example, an elaborate appeals process, you are more and more making it 
|>>into a legal system.
|>>
|>
|>In the long run there is no way to avoid this. You either 
|>create a global
|>system that provides rough justice, or you create one that 
|>provides some
|>needed finesse.
|>
|>One cheap way to help speed this up is a central archive on 
|>the web where
|>all decisions are published and where jurists from around the 
|>world and
|>from both sides of the fence can provide their commentaries 
|>on the decisions.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html