Re: FW: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 16:23 8/02/01 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:

>> 2) there needs to be a feedback mechanism that corrects for really bad
>> decisions.
>> 
>> Excellent.
>
>But very tricky.  Remember that one of the goals of the UDRP is to 
>*not* have it be a substitute for the law, and if you build, for 
>example, an elaborate appeals process, you are more and more making it 
>into a legal system.
>

In the long run there is no way to avoid this. You either create a global
system that provides rough justice, or you create one that provides some
needed finesse.

One cheap way to help speed this up is a central archive on the web where
all decisions are published and where jurists from around the world and
from both sides of the fence can provide their commentaries on the decisions.



--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html