Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 05:06 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > You know, if you have or had something to say about the NC structure or
> > Working Groups - or any comments on the draft bylaws on GA (which was
> > submitted for discussion) - you don't need my permission to post them.
>
>Oh.  But, I *did* post my comments, just didn't get any response.

Can you identify them for me? I don't find any posts from you in the WG on 
those topics, but I may have misfiled them.

>I hate to say it, but it is increasingly appearing as if you've been 
>facilitating
>more off-list WG discussion than on-list, particularly of late, and 
>especially when
>considering what you say further down (i.e., about offlist comments you've 
>received
>pertaining to voting on the WG ).

Dang, you can read my outbox now? How interesting.

>No, I have plenty to say.  Please refer me specifically to which clearly 
>stated
>issues/questions you're talking about here.

Names Council:
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00104.html

Working Groups:
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00102.html

>I have a difference *with* the summary report itself.

Ok, so noted.

> > As for by whom, who cares?
>Well, since it has to do with the WG-Review, I don't think the Chair 
>should be the
>one to decide "who cares"?

On 07:31 PM 2/1/01, Sotiropoulos said:
 > Just goes to show you... it's not *who*, it's *what*.


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html