<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.
At 06:47 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>I do commend you for coming forward and stating that it was your
>initiative.
That isn't what she said....nor was the suggestion that we work with
summaries and minority opinions her suggestion. *sigh* She said "I am one
of the members who raised the question about voting", which is true - that
she did not make the suggestion I passed to the list is also true.
>...t you went onlinst to second Greg's
>move (for what amounts to, in my mind) a rush-finish summary of the WG.
What move? I wrote:
"The suggestion has been made that we simply try to summarize material, and
incorporate minority opinions on the summaries into the report.
Any comments?"
That's a request for input, not a "move". I personally think it would be a
good idea, but if the WG doesn't want to do it, we won't.
Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|