Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Greg Burton wrote:

> At 06:47 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
> >I do commend you for coming forward and stating that it was your
> >initiative.
>
> That isn't what she said....

Marilyn Cade wrote:
"I am one of the members who raised the question about voting."

Sounds to me like an entire conference was going on...   Is there some kind of
unofficial, behind-the-scenes WG-Review ML going on?  sure beginning to sound
like it...  I'm sorry if this rankles, but the truth is, *nobody* should be
taking ANY of this personally.  If anybody is, that's their problem.  I would
just like to know where things stand, out in the open, and fairly.

> nor was the suggestion that we work with
> summaries and minority opinions her suggestion. *sigh* She said "I am one
> of the members who raised the question about voting", which is true - that
> she did not make the suggestion I passed to the list is also true.

But she did second that suggestion...and I believe she was the only one to do
so.

> >...t you went onlinst to second Greg's
> >move (for what amounts to, in my mind) a rush-finish summary of the WG.
>
> What move? I wrote:
>
> "The suggestion has been made that we simply try to summarize material, and
> incorporate minority opinions on the summaries into the report.
>
> Any comments?"
>
> That's a request for input, not a "move". I personally think it would be a
> good idea, but if the WG doesn't want to do it, we won't.

Greg, as Chair, please tell us why this "suggestion" could not have been made
publicly to all the Members of the WG by the initial author?  Why are you
speaking for somebody?  Doesn't that make you an advocate? albeit unwillingly?

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
        Hermes Network, Inc.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html