Re: [wg-review] EDUCATION and Outreach

[Eric Dierker <Eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

I would propose the best interests of his electorate is education and a
ICW represented body to help guide the internet. The US interests lie in
building a very productive internet commerce and educating the world how
to use it.

Sincerely,

"Miles B. Whitener" wrote:

> Mr. Burns is elected to represent the interests of his
> electorate, not the world.
> The US should advocate its interests, and other countries should
> (believe me they will) advocate theirs.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bukko" <bukko@od2.com>
> To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 8:56 AM
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] EDUCATION and Outreach
>
> I take it "this nation" is the US.
> Does the Internet belong to the US then?
> Does anyone else's opinion really matter?
>
> bukko
> OD2.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
> [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Eric Dierker
> Sent: 15 February 2001 14:44
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] EDUCATION and Outreach
>
> Who is going to educate this man and his colleagues?  Shall it be
> a
> cacophony of noise or a true education.  ICANN must take the lead
> here
> or give it to someone else.  I propose the hiring of an immediate
> educational liaison from outside the existing structure.
>
>                  Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) said it was premature to
>                   propose a legislative solution. He promised
> more
> hearings on the matter.
>
>  "The Internet has become so important to our nation's well-being
> that
> we in Congress need to become better informed about its
> operations," he
> said.
>  "We may still choose not to legislate, but at least that choice
> will be
> an
>  informed choice."   (WP-WASHTECH from worldatlarge site)
>
> This and my last post are strong position papers, someone else
> who is
> not an advocate should write the summary, paying close attention
> to the
> previous WG on subject.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html