RE: [wg-review] EDUCATION and Outreach

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 14:56 15/02/01, bukko said:

>I take it "this nation" is the US.
>Does the Internet belong to the US then?
>Does anyone else's opinion really matter?*

This will only result into the ICANN becoming the USNIC.

While .com, .org, .net .edu will become just some TLDs
among the augmented root system.

This is why we are contemplating the organization of the
IDNSO, with the revision of RFC.1591 as a first task.

Jefsey

>.
>bukko
>OD2.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
>Behalf Of Eric Dierker
>Sent: 15 February 2001 14:44
>To: wg-review@dnso.org
>Subject: [wg-review] EDUCATION and Outreach
>
>
>Who is going to educate this man and his colleagues?  Shall it be a
>cacophony of noise or a true education.  ICANN must take the lead here
>or give it to someone else.  I propose the hiring of an immediate
>educational liaison from outside the existing structure.
>
>
>
>                  Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) said it was premature to
>                   propose a legislative solution. He promised more
>hearings on the matter.
>
>  "The Internet has become so important to our nation's well-being that
>we in Congress need to become better informed about its operations," he
>said.
>  "We may still choose not to legislate, but at least that choice will be
>an
>  informed choice."   (WP-WASHTECH from worldatlarge site)
>
>This and my last post are strong position papers, someone else who is
>not an advocate should write the summary, paying close attention to the
>previous WG on subject.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html