RE: [wg-review] work

["bukko" <bukko@od2.com>]

Sorry to confuse matters; I am also in favour of both voting and
summarization, where the summary takes account of the vote result.

bukko
OD2.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Eric
Sent: 16 February 2001 02:50
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-review] work


I agree with Luca's point.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Luca Muscarà
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:40 PM
To: Greg Burton; wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] work


Greg Burton wrote:

Voting - I think you, bukko, and Gene Marsh, so far
Summarization - Marilyn and Kent.

Not sure about Phil King - Phil, should I count you in favor of both? :)


Actually just before I read this, I was thinking I'm in favour of both,
after
observing my own ability to follow this group.
I found both means very useful, but at different times: voting when I'm
focused on a topic in order to allow fast expression of my position and
check
out others' (not as fastly though) ;
and reading summaries in order to catch up, when I'm late to find the
point...

Luca Muscarà

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html