Re: [wg-review] work

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

Yes, you read me correctly.  Both have their place, with a summary being a
more accurate appraisal if carefully done with balanced view of different
input.  

Phil King in Butte MT


On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:39:34 +0100, muscara@geog.ucla.edu wrote:

>  Greg Burton wrote:
>  
>  Voting - I think you, bukko, and Gene Marsh, so far
>  Summarization - Marilyn and Kent.
>  
>  Not sure about Phil King - Phil, should I count you in favor of both? :)
>  
>  
>  Actually just before I read this, I was thinking I'm in favour of both,
after
>  observing my own ability to follow this group.
>  I found both means very useful, but at different times: voting when I'm
>  focused on a topic in order to allow fast expression of my position and
check
>  out others' (not as fastly though) ;
>  and reading summaries in order to catch up, when I'm late to find the
point...
>  
>  Luca Muscar?
>  
>  --
>  This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html