Re: [wg-review] Review WG Position Paper

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

Sounds like a good idea for those that can attend in person.  A
consideration would be if an online conference could be arranged for those
of us who do remote (firetalk?).  Otherwise, those who do attend will
(hopefully) convey a reasonable 'proxy' for those of us who cannot.

Phil in Butte!


On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:06:24 -0500, Babybows.com wrote:

>  It would be nice to have a meeting with all Review WG participants in
>  Melbourne prior to the Public Comment period scheduled for March 12. 
Could
>  our chair or liaison advise if any such preparations are being made, and
if
>  perhaps we could assist somehow?  I would recommend drafting a formal
>  position paper outlining the conclusions of the Review WG for
presentation
>  to the Board.  Comments?
>  
>  --
>  This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html