RE: [wg-review] Review WG Position Paper

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Sounds like a good idea for those that can attend in person.  A
consideration would be if an online conference could be arranged for those
of us who do remote (firetalk?).  Otherwise, those who do attend will
(hopefully) convey a reasonable 'proxy' for those of us who cannot.

Phil in Butte!


On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:06:24 -0500, Babybows.com wrote:

>  It would be nice to have a meeting with all Review WG participants in
>  Melbourne prior to the Public Comment period scheduled for March 12.
Could
>  our chair or liaison advise if any such preparations are being made, and
if
>  perhaps we could assist somehow?  I would recommend drafting a formal
>  position paper outlining the conclusions of the Review WG for
presentation
>  to the Board.  Comments?


Danny,
This is a good suggestion, but I regret I cannot attend Melbourne. Could you
draft a formal position paper on some of the issues to put before the WG
this week? (If Greg has conflicting plans, I'm sure he'll let us know in
response to this).
Joanna Lane

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html