ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] A good start


I don't support blowing up the existing constituency model, just because
there are issues or concerns by some.  In fact, the DNSO is a "young"
organization, and needs time to mature and change, as needed, to represent
the full set of stakeholders.

My goal is to be part of constructive change.

Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: babybows.com [mailto:webmaster@babybows.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 8:21 PM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-review] A good start


Jefsey Morfin has presented a reasonably well-defined structural model that
incorporates the views of many in this Working Group that supported the
abolition of the Constituency model, myself included.  I am confident that
in the time allowed, it will be possible to make whatever necessary
refinements are required by this model to ensure adequate representational
mechanisms.

As part of this working group will now focus on this first proposal, it will
become increasingly important for advocates of the
expanded/more-representative Constituency model to present their case as
well, so that we may all ultimately weigh the relative merits of each
clearly-defined and well-articulated proposal.

I remind you, in the end, we will need consensus.





--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>