RE: [wg-review] A good start

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 23:08 17/03/01 -0500, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>I don't support blowing up the existing constituency model, just because
>there are issues or concerns by some.  In fact, the DNSO is a "young"
>organization, and needs time to mature and change, as needed, to represent
>the full set of stakeholders.
>
>My goal is to be part of constructive change.
>

Marilyn,

In that case could you please comment on the "DN holders' constituency"
proposal that would include your BIZ constituency as part of a enlarged
group of 3 constituencies holding the balance of the Names Council.

My proposal would see two blocks of  constituencies each holding 9 seats on
the NC and a casting vote for a Chair who would be elected directly by the GA.

It make no sense for me to push this proposal any further if there is no
co-operation or interest from the (big and small) BIZ. people.

--joop
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html