Re: [wg-review] Names Council input

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:03:18 -0500, you wrote:

>It is my view that as all of our restructuring proposals will assuredly
>impact the Names Council, we have the obligation within the context of a
>consensus-based decision-making process to reach out to this potentially
>impacted party to hear their views on restructuring as well.  Marilyn Cade
>has already expressed the thoughtful opinion that "In fact, the DNSO is a
>"young" organization, and needs time to mature and change, as needed, to
>represent the full set of stakeholders."  Her comments suggest that we have
>an additional option to consider - keeping an improved version of the status
>quo structure.

For my part I agree with Marilyn and at this stage support keeping the
constituency structure but improving it by having additional
constituencies and also looking at whether there should be some
weighting for them.

DPF

--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html