RE: [wg-review] Names Council input

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Jefsey Morfin wrote:-
4. the WG-Review stays as the permanent place where to discuss new ideas.

I agree this makes sense. If and when DNSo is perfect, then, and only then,
can WG-Review Group possibly be considered redundant. It would be natural
for WG-Review's life to be extended for the foreseeable future, including
for the purpose of providing checks and balances on DNSO activities (or even
lack thereof). I suggest this would add much needed credibility to policy
recommendations emanating from the DNSO NC, something which I understand the
BoD has noted by its absence in the past.

Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html