Re: [cctld-discuss] Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report fromtheWG-C,new gTLDs.

["YJ Park" <yjpark@nic.or.kr>]

Dear Council,

I agree upon the point made by Nigel.

If I have to choose between 10 weeks and 8 weeks,
my heart would go to 10 weeks. 

However I have to recede a bit for compromise, 
yes 8 weeks fine.

We need more time to consider.
I hope those who may think it's already slow enough would understand
what other side of people would think of this process.

Regards,

YJ 


>A minimum of 45 days. (That's six weeks). The reason is that many
>non-internet organisations outside the US move much slower than
>internet time. (I am thinking of lawyers and other organisation
>outside the US, who may have particular comments).
>
>10 weeks seems generous.
>
>I would propose eight weeks or 2 calendar months.
>
>
>Nigel,
>
>HiroHOTTA wrote:
>> 
>> 45 days period seems to be fine.
>> 
>> Hiro
>> 
>> At 99/11/20 03:22,
>> > I've read the rather ongoing debate on how long to allow comment period to
>> > last for WG-C documents. Two weeks was used and taking into account the
>> > length of the report/annexes, and complexity, suggest the NC amend the
>> > original posting and extend the original deadline to January 3, 1999 (that's
>> > a Monday, and allows for 45 days). I think 10 weeks is much too long;
>> > likewise, nothing except the extension of comment time is being changed,
>> > i.e., the report, with annexes, is what is being commented on, as it was
>> > when the announcement for comments was made.
>> >
>> > If no one objects to the 45 day comment period (with January 3 being the
>> > deadline), Elisabeth and I'll draft an announcement to go out.
>> >
>> > Theresa
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
>> > Dennis Jennings
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:20 PM
>> > To:   council@dnso.org
>> > Subject:      RE: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the
>> > WG-C,new gTLDs.
>> >
>> > Colleagues,
>> >
>> > I would be very interested in your comments on this e-mail.
>> >
>> > It is my understanding that several people and international groups have
>> > complained that there is no possibility of commenting on a set of documents
>> > like this in two weeks - I think 10 weeks has been mentioned as a reasonable
>> > timescale.  (These complaints were (I think) in relation to ICANN documents
>> > rather than WG documents)
>> >
>> > I am particularly interested in hearing the views of the non US members of
>> > the
>> > Names Council on this.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Dennis
>> >
>> > --------------------------------
>> > Dennis Jennings
>> > Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie
>> > Phone:  +353 87 220 8225 (Mobile)
>> > Fax:  +353 1 495 1324
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:11 PM, DNSO Listadmin
>> > [SMTP:DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org] wrote:
>> > >
>> > > [ To: council@dnso.org, wg-b, wg-c, wg-d, wg-e]
>> > > [ To: announce@dnso.org, ga@dnso.org]
>> > >
>> > > Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
>> > >
>> > > The WG-C Interim Report is open for two weeks public comments,
>> > > starting today November 17th, 1999, ending Wednesday, December 1th.
>> > >
>> > > All comments shall be sent to comments-gtlds@dnso.org, no later
>> > > no later than December 1th, 1999 (18:00 CET). Any mail sent to
>> > > any other e-mail address will not be considered.
>> > >
>> > > The full WG-C document is rather long and cannot be posted
>> > > in a simple email. It includes 7 position papers.
>> > >
>> > > Please read it at:
>> > >     http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19991023.NCwgc-report.html
>> > >
>> > > The full archives of the WG-C are on line at:
>> > >     http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/maillist.html
>> > >
>> > > The WG-C is co-chaired by Javier Sola, named by the NC (liaison
>> > > co-chair), and by Jonathan Weinberg, elected by the WG-C members
>> > > (working co-chair).
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > DNSO Secretariat
>> >
>> ----------
>> Hirofumi Hotta
>> R&D Strategy Department, NTT
>
>
>--
>ccTLD Constituency of the DNSO
>Discussion Mailing List
>(Formerly wwtld@ripe.net)