Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>]

cant be done that day as icann staff & key board members are meeting with
cctld administrators in late afternoon. this is why the schedule has been
compressed to the times i proposed

ken

----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
Cc: <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "Elisabeth
PORTENEUVE" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Dany Vandromme"
<vandrome@renater.fr>; "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>; "names council"
<council@dnso.org>; "roberto gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>; "Mike Roberts"
<mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; "John Crain" <crain@icann.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september


> Hello Paul and all,
>
> It appears things move here.:-)
> Thanks a lot, Ken and Paul.
>
> > We need a costing and I have asked John Crain for the price for the
> > Webcasting. NSI have kindly agreed to sponsor the web cast SUBJECT to
> > obtaining an acceptable costing from ICANN/Berkman. If the costs are
> > toooooo great we will need additional sponsors and your offer of
> > assistance is most appreciated YJ. I hope John will be able to come back
> > to us/Roger within a day or two so we can put this issue to behind us.
> > Thanks Roger for helping out.....
>
> This sounds we almost fixed the dnso web cast decision for LA.
> As you suggested here, I will be happy to get additional sponsors
> in asia subject to the funding update by John and Roger.
>
> > For future meetings it may be a good idea to set-up a "fund" for remote
> > participation costs so we don't have this predicament at each
> > meeting....
>
> If nc's exsiting budget committee can come up with a long-term plan,
> this would be a good starting point to discuss and finalise it,
> hopely until LA meeting.
>
> > As for the room allocation. I have volunteered to be the liaison.....
> >
> > Would EACH constituency please advise me of the capacity of the room,
> > whether they prefer morning or afternoon, the expected duration (eg. ??
> > hours) for their constituency meeting and any "special" facilities
> > required by their constituency for the meeting.
>
> Thanks for your volunteer.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Non-Commercial Domain Name Holder's Constituency
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Date: 2000. 11. 13. Monday
> Place: Marriot(?)
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Expected attendees: 60 - 70 (?)
> Expected time: 9:00 - 18:00
> Expected facilities: 4 - 5 microphones, LCD Projector
> --------------------------------------------------------
> NCC is going to have a teleconference too, however,
> usually the telephone facility has been provided by ncc itself.
>
> If further info is needed, please contact me.
> Thanks again,
>
> YJ
>
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > YJ Park wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew and NC members,
> > >
> > > > Please see my attached email of 17 September, which repeats *two*
> earlier
> > > > requests that the Names Council urgently decide (1) whether to
webcast
> the
> > > > LA DNSO meetings, and, if so, how to pay for it;  and (2) the
schedule
> for
> > > > the LA meetings, and the identity of the scheduling contact.
> > >
> > > I have been a bit confused on whether web cast issue was going to be
> > > discussed
> > > in the budget committee rather than nc as a whole during the
> teleconference.
> > > Since this was tabled due to lack of time, we'd better start to
clarify
> each
> > > member's
> > >
> > > (1) yes and no to webcast the LA dnso meetings
> > >      if it turns out yes, let's suggest how to pay for it.
> > >
> > > (2) schedule for the LA meetings and the identity of the scheduling
> contact.
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > YJ Park, Non-commercial Constituency
> > >
> > > (1) Yes.
> > >       If it is going to be paid by donation by the companies, I will
try
> to
> > > raise fund
> > >       among companies in asia area asap. I prefer this option.
> > >       And if it is going to be paid by each constituency, ncc is going
> to
> > > try to share it.
> > >
> > > (2) I'm going to contact John and Paul as ncc contact point within 24
> hrs.
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > If the Names Council does not tomorrow make those decisions, I will
> assume
> > > > that the DNSO will not be meeting in LA, and that no webcast should
be
> > > > arranged.
> > >
> > > Hope it's not too late.
> > >
> > > As I proposed a teleconference on Otc. 5 in the review-committee,
> > > another brief teleconference, 20 mins asap might be an option to wrap
> this
> > > up.
> > >
> > > Let's wind this up asap.
> > >
> > > YJ
> > >
> > > > --Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On
Behalf
> Of
> > > Ken
> > > > Stubbs
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:40 PM
> > > > To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Andrew McLaughlin; Louis
> Touton;
> > > > names council
> > > > Cc: roberto gaetano; Mike Roberts
> > > > Subject: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21
september
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > for some reason the names council teleconference which is scheduled
> for
> > > > tomorrow has not been posted by elisabeth so here goes
> > > >
> > > > date: thurdsay september 21, 2000
> > > > time: 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 cet
> > > >
> > > > telephone number
> > > >
> > > > Then the dial number will be +33-1-41-74-78-83
> > > > No passcode is required
> > > >
> > > > agenda items:
> > > >
> > > > approval of prior meetings minutes
> > > > budget workgroup report roger & erica
> > > > dnso review report- theresa
> > > > financial report from icann staff
> > > > icann staff report
> > > > for status on independent  review panel nominations.
> > > > proxy voting proposal - paul kane
> > > > business constituancy dues problem
> > > > intake committee report
> > > > discussion regarding individual outreach and representation
> > > >
> > > > we have a lot to accomplish here and i plan on starting the
conference
> on
> > > > time...
> > > >
> > > > repeat.... 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 CET thursday 21 september
> > > >
> > > > see you on the call..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>