Re: [council] NC Agenda for October 19

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>]

i received the agenda and proposed modifications back to you within 24 hours
. i then assented to comments made and expected it to go to elizabeth for
posting. as far as i was concerned the matter was put to bed. i believe your
instructions for procedure indicated that elizabeth ws to post not me.

ken


----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
To: "Ken Stubbs Reg" <kstubbs@corenic.org>
Cc: "DNSO Council (Public archive)" <council@dnso.org>; "Elisabeth DNSO Sec"
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 8:37 AM
Subject: [council] NC Agenda for October 19


>
> Ken,
> update on Intake Committee process for the agenda.
> The IC sent you a proposed agenda for the Oct 19 meeting 14 days prior to
> the meeting. This was intended to get to the whole NC within 24 hours sent
> out by Elisabeth following your agreement or changes.
>
> It is now Monday October 9, and so 10 days prior to the meeting and the NC
> has not yet seen the agenda. This does nothing for the main objective of
> having an IC - to improve the time for consultation.
>
> Indeed according to the proposal agreed by the NC Elisabeth should have
sent
> it out within 24 hours of her receiving it with or without notice from the
> Chair. (The Chair can change it later if needed).
>
> Lets not let this new procedure fall at the first hurdle.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philip Sheppard
> AIM - European Brands Association
> 9  av. des Gaulois  B-1040 Brussels
> Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702
>
>