Re: [council] New ICANN IDNsCommitee

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Philip:

As I said before:  In order the DNSO has also a full coverage of IDN
issues.   It is not enough that the IDN commitee be diverse (the second
motion).  Also it is important that DNSO has a full coverage of this
issues (the first motion).

As the steps you said it is has to be taken, I have seen some motions
that never was discussed by phone or physical meetings that has being
undergone votation, and also some motions has being voted online after
some discussion online.  Only you and Milton has contributed with the
discussion of this motion, as far as I remember.   

Best Regards
Vany

Philip Sheppard wrote:
> 
> Vany,
> the Names Council does not simply vote on any motion proposed. We first :
> - assess the need for the motion's objective
> - then discuss it at a telephone or physical meeting
> - then vote at a meeting.
> 
> At present you have suggested:
> - there is a need for the commitee to have ascii and non ascii experts -
> AGREED
> 
> - you suggest this should be achieved in part by the DNSO asking for an
> extra seat on the committee. BUT, the current mix of the committee is
> already full of non ascii experts.
> 
> So, what reason is there fo rthe DNSO to ask for one more rep?
> 
> Philip

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa