Re: [ga] List rules

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>]

At 10:20 PM 8/23/00 +0200, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>At 11:23 23/08/2000 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>>The proper way to do this is have the list moderator and two others 
>>(usually appointed by the list owner). The goal is to have both 
>>protection for the list moderator and an independent review in all 
>>complaint decisions.
>
>I thought that the GA members wanted list monitors who were chosen by the 
>members and responsible to the members, rather than to an "externally 
>appointed" person?
>
>The closest thing we have to a list owner is the NC, or possibly the GA chair.

NC creates a problem. GA Chair is more suitable, but it really should be 
the operational list keeper.

>Strange to see you arguing for more power to the NC....

I'm full of surprises. But I'm not quite stretching it that far. ;)


Best Regards,

Simon Higgs

--
It's a feature not a bug...

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html