ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[3]: [ga] Reform in the GA?


Hello Joop,

Wednesday, February 07, 2001, 3:46:11 AM, Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 23:53 6/02/01 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:

>>
>>I doubt Joop Teernstra (who opposed the rules that eliminated the
>>Baptista problem) was taking credit for that.
>>

> Mr Walsh in his zeal for carrying his vendetta anew to this list, has some
> problem with the truth here.
> I never opposed the list rules. I suggested an improvement.

Yes, and when those improvements were not supported, you opposed the
adoption of the rules in favor the extremist rules that you pushed
into the IDNO, and supported the actions of those who left the GA in
protest over what was simply rules of simply civil discourse (which
have been effective in solving the problems that were facing the GA at
that time).

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>