ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Qualifications for GA Chair?


Dear Brett,
On 21:57 28/02/01, Bret Fausett said:
> > Technically, the Chair of an assembly which should elect 47% of the BoD is
> > a key person.
>
>Let's be clear about what the General Assembly is and is not. It is not the
>At Large. It also was not intended to be the At Large equivalent within the
>Domain Name Supporting Organization, nor is it necessarily the right vehicle
>for the At Large members to influence DNS policy.

You confuse a lot of things here which are obviously wrong. So I
can only agree with you. But you do that to negatively support a
opinon I disagree with.

>The General Assembly is the gathering of all DNSO constituency members and
>unaffiliated persons interested in participating in the work of the Domain
>Name Supporting Organization. It does not elect any Board member, though it
>could certainly serve as a place to discuss the issues with candidates for
>the single DNSO seat that becomes vacant each year.

This is your opinon, not my target. Eventually my conception
will prevail because of the KISS principle. I am not in hurry.
But a lot of wasted time IMHO.

Jefsey


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>