<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Re[2]: [ga] Re: ASO + PSO = TSO Technical Supporting Organisation
Hello William,
I agree your suggestion that the IETF does not fit either supply or demand
side - as I understand it, they are more a technical standards setting
organisation.
However, my comment was made in the context of a discussion on DNSO review -
or at least that is what I thought. In this context, I would view technical
input as a relatively minor part of the supply side (tho something of
particular concern to the Registry and Registrar constituencies).
erica
> Hello erica,
>
> Friday, June 15, 2001, 8:13:00 PM, erica wrote:
>
> >>
> > Patrick said:
> > > I much prefer a three-way split between supply, demand and technical
> >> > infrastructure (such as ISPs and telcos). That's natural and works
> > pretty
> >> > well in Australia.
>
> > I'm not sure where this works in Australia, but in my experience the
> > technical is generally seen as part of the supply side. Demand side
> > identifies the outcomes required or needed, but the ways and means of
> > achieving outcomes are the responsibility of supply side.
>
> Perhaps in most instances, but in this case, the technical are
> distinctly different and have a different set of concerns and issues.
> The IETF for instance doesn't really fit the profile of a supplier or
> a consumer, nor would it share the same set of concerns as either of
> those.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|