ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Who owns ICANN?


I have been blocked for the fourth time when asking for ownership records of the
ICANN ownership.  It would seem that final papers have not been filed and that we
have no rightful ownership of ICANN.  In light of an IRS review coming up it would
seem proper for disclosure of ownership at this time.

Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Ross John and all assembly members,
>
> Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > It is a common misconception that registrars are somehow prohibited from
> > stockpiling. There are no such restrictions in any ICANN/Registry agreement
> > that I am aware of.
>
>   None that I am aware of either.  None the less John's point is still
> well taken as the ICANN BoD and staff have oversight responsibilities
> under the MoU, which is a contractual agreement with the NTIA.
> In addition the stakeholders have predominantly and frequently
> found that the preactice of stockpiling Domain Names is not
> desired.  Yet the ICANN BOD and staff have continued to turn
> a blind eye to this practice by some.
>
> >
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
> > To: <admin@consumer.net>; "[GA]" <ga@dnso.org>; "Dan Halloran"
> > <halloran@icann.org>; <touton@icann.org>; <mclaughlin@pobox.com>
> > Cc: <michael@palage.com>; <afilias@joker.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:56 AM
> > Subject: [ga] Re: Joker.com filing "common law" .info claims
> >
> > > Russ,
> > >
> > > What I don't understand about this is that the registrars' operating
> > > agreement with ICANN is supposed to prohibit them from stockpiling domains
> > > for their own benefit.
> > >
> > > I realize that ICANN has its hands full, busily maintaining Internet
> > > stability all day, but does anyone there monitor registrar compliance with
> > > the accreditation agreement?  Or care?
> > >
> > > There would not appear to be any incentive on ICANN's part to do anything
> > > about, though.  ICANN is not an aggrieved party to registrar accreditation
> > > violations, and it will be a cold day in a hot place if any registrar were
> > > ever to get its ticket yanked.  Won't happen.  It is one of those jobs
> > like
> > > monitoring dispute resoluton service provider compliance - nice idea, but
> > > where's the incentive to actually do it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>