Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request - NC punts of Dannys request?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Peter and all assembly members,

  This sounds an awful lot like you Peter, and I can only expect Ken
Stubbs too, are not going to do their job.

Peter de Blanc wrote:

> Why do you guys (and gals) continue to dig up all this diversionary
> rhetoric and citations?
>
> 1. The ICANN bylaws provide the mechanism for constituency creation.
>
> 2. Many, if not most, NC members and Board members support the idea.
>
> My suggestion is to get to work, establish a corporation, with by-laws,
> charter, bank account, and prepart a (current, year 2001) document for
> submission.
>
> Peter de Blanc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
> DannyYounger@cs.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:23 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Cc: kstubbs@digitel.net
> Subject: [ga] Re: Documentation request
>
> Ken,
>
> Pardon me if I sounded at all pessimistic.  I do believe that you can
> spearhead this effort in the Council, and only seek to remind you of the
>
> explicit language of the Business Plan to which the Council has
> committed
> itself:
>
> The original language stated the following:
> 5.4 Individuals Constituency. Review the need, uniqueness, potential
> contribution and representiveness of an individual domain name holder's
> constituency. http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/doc00003.doc
>
> This language was then modified by Erica:
> 5.4 New Constituencies: Review and clarify process for creation of new
> constituencies http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/doc00004.doc
>
> The change in wording was acceptable to your Chair:
> "Erica, thanks for your insight. I support both your changes.  Philip."
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/msg00016.html
>
> The Business Plan was then ratified at the Melbourne session.
>
> As the Council has already made the decision to "clarify the process",
> we are
> waiting for the Council to get its job done.
>
> Quoting Erica:  "I believe it is more important for us to focus on the
> process issue than on the specific question of whether an Individual
> Constituency should be established.  Once the process is clarified, then
> it
> is clear what hoops any group (including those who wish to establish an
> individuals constituency) will have to jump thru in order to get
> recognition." http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/msg00015.html
>
> If you can facilitate this "clarification", we will offer you all
> necessary
> support.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html