Re: [ga] Re: GA/DNSO Funding

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

Could someone please point me to the URL that memorializes this debate?
And the part where input from the community was solicited and received? I
missed it, but I don't follow every forum.  I know there was one, because
ICANN is open and transparent and bottom-up, and this is obviously an
issue that others besides the Board might wish to comment on, and I'd hate
to miss the next round of the discussion.


On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Rick H Wesson wrote:

> 
> Mike,
> 
> 
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Mike Roberts wrote:
> 
> > Rick -
> >
> > This issue has been debated at length by the Board and executive
> > staff.  The original CTO job was created by Jon for himself.   If he
> > had lived, the relationship between the reservoir of technical smarts
> > inside ICANN versus that resident in the PSO and its constituent
> > organizations would have been quite different.
> 
> I understand and wish things had turned out different.
> 
> > I think the Board and Stuart Lynn have an open mind about the future.
> > There are those who prefer that ICANN defer to the PSO in technical
> > areas, and there are others who feel that it should have a senior
> > person.  At the present time, there is an opening for a senior
> > systems manager that is under recruitment.  In another organization,
> > it might be called CTO.  In ICANN, given the past, no one wants to
> > seem to be putting on airs.
> 
> 
> due to the numerous technical issues registrars, registries, and
> registrants are faced with, it is the DNSO Registrars hope that ICANN will
> endeavor to find an appropriate CTO and one that won't be assigned
> "Systems Manager" duties.
> 
> We will never find another Postel, however we still need the position
> budgeted for and the vacancy filed.
> 
> best regards,
> 
> -rick
> 
> 
> > - Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > At 17:21 -0700 8/27/01, Rick H Wesson wrote:
> > >Mike,
> > >
> > >upon review of the FY2001-2002 budget I note that there is no provision
> > >for a CTO. For a organization created for technical administration I am
> > >troubled that there are provision for more legal staff such as a
> > >Associate General Counsel or Policy Analysist but no current provision for
> > >a CTO.
> > >
> > >I understand that the CTO position was reserved for Jon; however, not
> > >staffing such an important role for a Technical body make it hard to
> > >believe that ICANN is designed for anything but Technical Administration.
> > >
> > >could you comment why a CTO wasn't placed while you were president?
> > >
> > >thanks,
> > >
> > >-rick
> > >
> > >Rick H Wesson
> > >CTO Registrars Constituency
> > >CEO Alice's Registry - An ICANN Accredited Registrar
> >
> > --
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                 -->It's very hot and humid here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html