ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force


These benefits (which seem quite real), however, accrue from disscussion
in search of sensible harmonization, and don't actually require a formal
relationship -- do they?.


On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Peter Dengate-Thrush wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
> To: "Peter Dengate-Thrush" <pdthrush@actrix.co.nz>
> Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force
> 
> 
> > Actually, I kind of wonder
> > 1. why icann should have ANY say over ccTLDs?
> > 2. why ccTLDs should have ANY say over ICANN?
> >
> 
> Good questions. We rather see it as an exploration of what advantages will
> accrue to the internet community, taken separately within our own countries,
> and globally, from
> coming together.
> Are there policies which we can develop together?
> We have begun to think there are, by reference to our Best Practices
> document for example.
> Others have found it helpful to refer to the UDRP in developing their own
> local DRPs.
> 
> Together, the gTLD administration - ICANN, and the rest of the world's
> registry managers may form quite a useful body.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Peter Dengate Thrush
> Senior Vice Chair
> Asia Pacific TLD Association
> APTLD Adcom member
> 
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                 -->It's very hot and humid here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>