Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Eric,
you may have noted that Peter de Blanc by his own responded positively to 
the nicSO and the multi SO Membership for constituencies proposition. This 
would permit ccTLDs to address their TLD Registry obligations with other 
registries and to address their TLD Manager obligations and interests in an 
appropriate forum with appropriate interlocutors.

I am sorry but the DNSO/GA is by no means legitimate to question and debate 
IANA, ASO or BoD related issues. No more than to debate non ICANN related 
issues of international or regional interest to local NICs.

I underlilne that the very poor way the ICANN manages its own NIC functions 
leads many to believe the local NIC issues would be more efficiently 
debated elsewhere.

ccTLDs are part of the DNSO as Registries. These registries are under local 
law and have their own naming plan and charter. I only wish they would be 
more actively innovative and teach the ICANN how to run a NIC.

Jefsey

On 08:31 03/09/01, Eric Dierker said:
>Sotiris,
>Don't take this wrong but I do not like where this is going!
>
>I for one Scarlet don't give a damn.  That is I do not care what a bunch 
>of fat
>cat ccTLD managers are interested in.  To date I have yet see one speak up 
>and say
>"this is what my people want, need and are going to get".  When I hear one 
>of them
>refer to the ccTLD they are involved in as belonging to the people as a public
>resource to be exploited and used for the benefit of their respective 
>country's'
>people then I will care.  Until then I do not see them as more than wanna 
>be baby
>Verisigns.
>
>I beg any of you involved to tell me otherwise and then I will publicly 
>praise and
>market your great cause.
>
>(yes I am trying to tweak some ccTLDs into commitment)
>Eric
>
>Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> > William X Walsh wrote:
> >
> > > What are these issues that the ccTLD community feels have been
> > > neglected?  Specifics please.  In this way, the ccTLD community can
> > > start taking an active roll in advancing awareness of those issues.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Peter and Elisabeth could put up a web page describing some of
> > > the ccTLD related issues that they feel ICANN should be addressing,
> > > and then the GA, as a part of the DNSO (where those issues belong) can
> > > begin the process of developing recommendations and recommended policy
> > > to cover to them.
> >
> > I will second WXW's call for a description of the specific ccTLD related
> > issues whch ICANN ought to be addressing.  I think the GA is the 
> perfect place
> > to hear such matters.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html