Re: [ga] Net security's a losing battle

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

But what, in your view, is there to discuss about this?  I thought ICANN
has long has the obligation and power to create a backup - that's the
"escrow" it's supposed to run.  AFAIK, it just hasn't bothered.  Too busy
explaining why an at-large membership is a danger to the internet?  No
policy changes are required here, just staff action to implement
long-existing policy.  Or am I missing something?

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> Did you know that if NSI-Registrar was put out of business in a permanent,
> WTC sense (god forbid), that there are currently no defined process for
> recreating the service records for some 16 million or so registrants? I'd
> say that fact alone makes ICANN an appropriate forum to discuss the issue.
> We might not be able to wrap our arms around a lot of topics, but the ones
> that we can are fairly important.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> Tucows Inc.
> t. 416.538.5492
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                 -->It's very hot and humid here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html