<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Consensus development process
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Chuck Gomes writes that "no valid consensus development process has ever been
> put into place." I find this comment somewhat troubling at a time when the
> Names Council has established a Task Force charged with arriving at a binding
> consensus policy regarding the issue of transfers.
It's nice that you're troubled, but I don't think you being troubled is
going to change the last couple of years of history.
Chuck's right.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|