Re: [ga] OBJECTION Re: Transfer TF elections

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>]

Sandy Harris wrote:

>
>Second, the people playing silly games on this list are the ones trying
>to change the election procedures in mid-stream and introduce the notion
>that runners up become observers, not the ones trying to just have a
>normal election of a representative.


I agree with Sandy here, the election should proceed according to the rules 
stated (i.e. one representative).
Two additional comments.

1. I appreciate the effort of Danny to get more GA people onboard, and the 
consideration that participation should be open anyhow, but I would like to 
stress that participation means "individual participation", not 
participation as representative of a group.
In other words, nobody would object on any GA member to participate in an 
open WG, but objection to participation of individuals "as representatives 
of the GA" following elections whose rules have been changed while ongoing, 
is in order. In other words, I disagree that the end justifies the means: we 
should apply our own procedures.

2. We have the election rules, we have an election process going on, let's 
go. If the watchdog committee (that is providing a safety net exactly 
against abuses in the election process) believes that the ballots are 
irregular, they will act according to their mandate.

In the meantime, we are only losing time. I am for going on, immediately, 
according to the initially established rules, i.e. one GA representative. 
Let it be either Thomas, or Eric, or Jeff. A second one will not be 
according to the rules, and until the new rules are not voted in, should not 
be done.

Best regards
Roberto



_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html