ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NewRoot Council


Nobody needs an authority to implement a new TLD. ICANN doesn't, 
NewRoot doesn't, BORooN does neither.

But if anybody is setting up visible TLDs, these should rely on solid, 
stable infrastructures. Stable infrastructures mean that the user 
should be sure to be able to run his domain, and that this domain is 
visible to the part of the world (s)he wants to address.

I look at name councils, TLD authorization and the like as the wrong 
point of view. The function of a root server network is to resolve TLDs 
and not to allow or reject them.

Best regards,
Pascal


On 17 Dec 2001 at 2:30, Jim Fleming wrote:

> "ICANN represents that it has no authority to implement new TLDs"
> http://www.icann.org/tlds/correspondence/esi-v-icann-13nov00.htm
> 
> It all boils down to fairness.
> Which list do you think is more fair ?
> The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ?
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
> or
> The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> 
> Why would people pay for Address Space, when it is FREE ?
> 
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
> http://www.in-addr.info
> 3:219 INFO
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pascal Bernhard - cube" <pbernhard@cube.de>
> To: <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] NewRoot Council
> 
> 
> > Jim and all assembly members,
> >
> > ICANN 3? As long as TLDs will be *authorized* without any clear,
> > logical rules, this stuff will stay a struggel between ICANN and
> > wannabe-ICANN.
> >
> > There's no reason why these 7 guys are better as the ICANN BoD nor
> > vice- versa. Furthermore, the legitimacy level is lesser than that of
> > the ICANN.
> >
> > The business of providers is to provide technical or economical
> > facilities. To *approve* or to *authorize* TLDs is nobody's business.
> > Period.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Pascal
> >
> >
> > On 16 Dec 2001 at 15:41, Jim Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > > http://newroot.com/council.html
> > > >
> > > > The NewRoot Council is charged with the approval of new TLDs. The
> > > > Council consist of seven individuals who volunteered to assist
> > > > NewRoot with this difficult task. The Council can be best compared
> > > > with a Jury in a court room.
> > > >
> > > > The following individuals have agreed to assist NewRoot as members
> > > > of the Council.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  1) Prof. Dr.  M.J. Matser
> > > > 2) Prof. J.F Sinclair
> > > > 3) Mr. M.J.P. Leenders
> > > > 4) Mr. B.J. Schadd
> > > > 5) Ing. P.J.S.I Scheepers
> > > > 6) B. Thornton
> > > > 7) B. Stegers
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming
> > > Why Gamble on a .BIZ Lottery? Start a Real .BIZ Today !
> > > http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
> > > 0:212 - BIZ World
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ================================
> > Pascal Bernhard
> > cube
> > Geschäfte werden von Menschen gemacht...
> > pbernhard@cube.de
> > http://cube.de/
> > http://boroon.de/
> > FON: +49-6352-753725
> > FAX: +49-6352-753726
> > Mail: Im See 3 - 67295 Bolanden
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> 
> 

================================
Pascal Bernhard
cube
Geschäfte werden von Menschen gemacht...
pbernhard@cube.de
http://cube.de/
http://boroon.de/
FON: +49-6352-753725
FAX: +49-6352-753726
Mail: Im See 3 - 67295 Bolanden

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>