Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Marilyn and all assembly members,

  Thank you Marilyn for sharing your view.  I am sure it will be
received
appropriately.

  My personal comment is that I am not surprised at you response here.
I would ask that how is ti that a motion that would display or determine

a consensus of the DNSO GA be a "Diversion from doing useful
work"?  It would seem the opposite would be true to me...

Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

>   I disagree with the vote and think this a diversion from doing
> useful work. Marilyn Cade
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Palmer [mailto:jp@ADNS.NET]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:54 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
>
>
>
> Ok Tom - thats 9 - Whats the magic number?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jefsey <mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr>
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
>
> I second all this. I suggest that the icannatlarge.com presents this
> motion to its members and they register on the GA to participate to
> such a vote. May be a good occasion to have the GA list taking overt
> the ALSC list to be closed? This a real occasion if everyone shares in
> it. Like for Plan B.
> jfc
>
> On 02:14 03/05/02, Joanna Lane said:
>
>
>
> PLEASE INDICATE YOUR PREFERENCE  BELOW.
>
> Mr. James Love, a member in good standing  of the DNSO's General
> Assembly, has made a call for action, specifically stating:
>
>  "I move that the GA poll its members, to record its views on whether
> or not the US Department of Commerce should have an open competition
> for the services now provided by ICANN. The rationale for asking for a
> rebid is that ICANN has dramatically changed the initial terms of
> reference for ICANN, and is proposing even further changes, which have
> met extensive opposition in the Internet community. The rebid would
> allow the NTIA to consider alternatives to the current ICANN plan for
> managing key Internet resources.
>
> The vote should be taken within 10 days."
>
> Seconds: John Palmer, Danny Younger.
>
> Members who have indicated their agreement with taking a Vote:-
>
>
>
> 1.      James Love (Proponent)
>
> 2.      John Palmer (Second)
>
> 3.      Danny Younger (Second)
>
> 4.      Jeanette Hoffman
>
> 5.      Joanna Lane
>
> 6.      Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> 7.      Karl Auerbach
>
> 8.      .
>
> 9.      .
>
>
> Members who have indicated their disagreement with taking a Vote:-
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system ( http://www.grisoft.com
> <http://www.grisoft.com/> ).
> Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html