<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
I agree with Marilyn &
disagree with the vote as presented to us, all this is obstruction of our
ongoing work.
If anyone is sincere enough,
then first we should have a series of discussions and second the recommended
ballot should have first included couple well thought alternatives, well thought
implementation plan, management feasibility study, planned funding plan, action
items, solutions, management structure & background qualification and
so forth in order to justify why that any new body will be better than ICANN,
more qualified or can be up to the global challenges.
Further, the timeline posted is
not reasonable at all and seems as bad as the vote ballot
itself.
Maybe many of you don't agree
with ICANN policy or strategy, maybe we have grievances, some of us ccTLD
managers have problems with ICANN's decisions, but no one on the GA so far have
even offered a logical ICANN alternative or even suggested a qualified body
to take on the task from ICANN without disturbing our DNS
operations.
It is always very easy to blame
others and start red herrings to obstruct advancements, but it is very hard to
recommend and deliver suitable alternatives.
Best Regards,
Asaad Alnajjar
CEO Millennium Inc.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:24
PM
Subject: RE: [ga] Motion asking for GA
poll on rebid of ICANN contract
I
disagree with the vote and think this a diversion from doing useful work.
Marilyn Cade
Ok Tom - thats 9 - Whats the magic
number?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:37
PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Motion asking for
GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
I second all this. I suggest that the icannatlarge.com
presents this motion to its members and they register on the GA to
participate to such a vote. May be a good occasion to have the GA list
taking overt the ALSC list to be closed? This a real occasion if everyone
shares in it. Like for Plan B. jfc
On 02:14 03/05/02, Joanna
Lane said:
PLEASE INDICATE
YOUR PREFERENCE BELOW.
Mr. James Love,
a member in good standing of the DNSO's General Assembly, has made
a call for action, specifically stating:
"I move that the GA poll its members, to record its
views on whether or not the US Department of Commerce should have an
open competition for the services now provided by ICANN. The rationale
for asking for a rebid is that ICANN has dramatically changed the
initial terms of reference for ICANN, and is proposing even further
changes, which have met extensive opposition in the Internet community.
The rebid would allow the NTIA to consider alternatives to the current
ICANN plan for managing key Internet resources.
The vote
should be taken within 10 days."
Seconds:
John Palmer, Danny Younger.
Members who
have indicated their agreement with taking a Vote:-
- James Love (Proponent)
- John Palmer (Second)
- Danny Younger (Second)
- Jeanette Hoffman
- Joanna Lane
- Sotiris Sotiropoulos
- Karl Auerbach
- .
- .
Members who have
indicated their disagreement with taking a Vote:-
--- Incoming mail is certified Virus
Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 /
Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG
anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 / Virus
Database: 197 - Release Date:
19/04/02
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|