<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] No At-Large & no GA
>
> Petitioning the NTIA to recompete the ICANN contracts is the only
remaining
> action that can serve to protect our interests.
> --
Whose interests? Those of the GA? Yours? Individual users that expect
nothing more from the DNS than simple resolution? Perchance, Registrants?
Perhaps I didn't say this clearly enough yesterday - there was a time, not
too long ago, when DNS policy was determined by a government and a defense
contractor - the rest be damned as it were. The current "mess", to borrow a
phrase from the critics, is far more desirable than having to appeal to the
House.
Be aware of what you are actually proposing.
-rwr
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|