ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Individual Stakeholders Constituency


This is a good idea. I would support this.

    -- Bret

Kent Crispin wrote:
> Proposal:
> 
> Take the current GA apparatus (mailing list, voting registry, etc) and
> clone it.  Name it the "individual stakeholders constituency" (ISC), and
> seed it with the "membership" of the GA.  Give it 6 months to a year to
> come up with a charter approved by ICANN, and give it 3 votes on the
> Names Council when (if) that charter gets approved, and that the
> constituency dues can be paid.  Let the DNSO secretariate support it,
> at least for the time being.
> 
> The current GA can continue as it was originally designe: a
> cross-constituency forum; people can join or drop from the ISC as they
> see fit, but in my opinion there should not be any restrictions on
> membership in the ISC, other than that the member be able to establish
> that they are a real human being, and that they pay dues as required.
> (In particular, participation in another constituency in any capacity
> should not be a restriction on participation in the ISC in any
> capacity, except that a person can only be elected to the NC once.)

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>