RE: [ga] DNSO Bushwhacked by the registries and registrars

[jefsey <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

French law forbids to link a tax to an expense, even if they are exceptions 
(but needing a law).
IMHO it would be the best way to hurt no contributor as it would be a 
common rule.
jfc




On 04:11 17/05/02, Joanna Lane said:

>Danny Younger wrote:
> > Here in the US, the Internal Revenue Service collects funds from the
> > "stakeholders" (citizens) and yet the IRS does not have any say
> > in how those
> > funds are to be allocated. <snip>
>
>Excellent point. And not only the IRS in America, also in Europe and
>elsewhere. But this actually points to the enforcement issue. Because the
>IRS does not set the taxes, it simply acts as an enforcement agency for
>those who set the taxes (elected representatives of government), then
>perhaps we should be thinking about splitting these functions in the context
>of internet regulation also. If there was an enforcing agency, independent
>of ICANN, (or its successor) would that solve some of the problems?
>
>Regards,
>Joanna
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02