RE: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org] 
|> On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
|> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:58 PM
|> To: DNSO Secretariat; voters@dnso.org; ga-full@dnso.org
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org; halloran@icann.org
|> Subject: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions 
|> about ICANN Reform, May 2002
|> 
|> 
|> So - a clear majority of voters (67%) want the DoC to 
|> initiate a rebid for
|> the role currently carried out by ICANN.
|> 
|> And - if you soften the criticism a little, you can raise 
|> that to 75%.

This can not be assumed.
 
|> But you don't actually need Motion 2, because a majority of 
|> nearly 7 out of
|> 10 want ICANN's position to be radically challenged by DoC.

Totally false.  The higher level of support for Motion 2 raises the
question as to Motion 1 being appropriate.

|> Good vote. Thanks to everyone who cared enough to vote.
|> 
|> Will the leadership of ICANN please respond? (Or preferably, 
|> just GO!)

Not a helpful comment.

<snip>

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html