<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002
On 01:20 p.m. 24/05/2002 +1000, Dassa said:
>Totally false. The higher level of support for Motion 2 raises the
>question as to Motion 1 being appropriate.
It may still raise that question for you and Mr Walsh, but *all* GA
members had the opportunity to answer that question by voting AGAINST
motion 1.
--Joop
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|