ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002


Thursday, May 23, 2002, 10:06:08 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:

> On 01:20 p.m. 24/05/2002 +1000, Dassa said:

>>Totally false.  The higher level of support for Motion 2 raises the
>>question as to Motion 1 being appropriate.

> It may still raise that question for you  and Mr Walsh, but *all* GA 

"Mr Walsh" doesn't vote in inappropriate votes that violate the
charter and are outside the charter dictated role of the DNSO GA.

The vote is irrelevant.  It was inappropriate, it should not have
occurred, and its result has absolutely no bearing on anything.

Shame on Thomas for even letting it happen.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>