Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

actually...I beg to differ. The relevant jurisdiction claimed by one
party is that. Just wait till it goes to court before making such bold
assertions please?

agreement on the rest.


"Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:
> 
> > This is an international environment we are dealing with here folks.  A
> > good chunk of the world does not even operate under common law...so
> > agency law as Ross learned it...is totally inapplicable. there are
> > analogous concepts, yes. but the correspondence and statute, and caselaw
> > and interpretation and legal foundations...are completely different.
> 
> Actually no - for 99% of the transfers, the relevant jurisdiction is
> Virginia or Delaware.
> 
> > I think Danny Younger makes a good point.  So why not focus on coming up
> > with a definition we all want to see inserted into contractual terms
> > like the agreements between registrant and registrar, etc?
> 
> I think that's the whole purpose of this exercise. Problem being, despite
> the constant criticism from some quarters, there isn't a lot of drafting
> going on. The core of a successful task force will always be competing
> proposals surrounding by cogent debate. Without it, nothing effective can
> really be accomplished.
> 
> I strongly dare the GA to put together a document such as you have described
> Dan. The TF needs this.
> 
> -rwr

-- 
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin		phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec		fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html