Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

To be more precise (and perhaps less bold ;) Registrars and Registries have
agreed to the terms under which transfers will be conducted according to the
laws in the jurisdictions that I mentioned. Everything else flows from
there.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Steinberg" <synthesis@videotron.ca>
To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Cc: <DannyYounger@cs.com>; <ga@dnso.org>; <mcade@att.com>;
<roessler@does-not-exist.org>; <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>;
<RJS@lojo.co.nz>; <nick.wood@nom-iq.com>; <grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz>;
<crusso@verisign.com>; <mcf@uwm.edu>; <orobles@nic.mx>;
<james.love@cptech.org>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion


> actually...I beg to differ. The relevant jurisdiction claimed by one
> party is that. Just wait till it goes to court before making such bold
> assertions please?
>
> agreement on the rest.
>
>
> "Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:
> >
> > > This is an international environment we are dealing with here folks.
A
> > > good chunk of the world does not even operate under common law...so
> > > agency law as Ross learned it...is totally inapplicable. there are
> > > analogous concepts, yes. but the correspondence and statute, and
caselaw
> > > and interpretation and legal foundations...are completely different.
> >
> > Actually no - for 99% of the transfers, the relevant jurisdiction is
> > Virginia or Delaware.
> >
> > > I think Danny Younger makes a good point.  So why not focus on coming
up
> > > with a definition we all want to see inserted into contractual terms
> > > like the agreements between registrant and registrar, etc?
> >
> > I think that's the whole purpose of this exercise. Problem being,
despite
> > the constant criticism from some quarters, there isn't a lot of drafting
> > going on. The core of a successful task force will always be competing
> > proposals surrounding by cogent debate. Without it, nothing effective
can
> > really be accomplished.
> >
> > I strongly dare the GA to put together a document such as you have
described
> > Dan. The TF needs this.
> >
> > -rwr
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html